Insurgent Environmental Planning: Waste Management in Informal Settlements and Community-University Partnerships

Insurgent Environmental Planning: Waste Management in Informal Settlements and Community-University Partnerships

This is a case study preview. To access the full case study and teaching materials, navigate to the case library and enter your password. If you need a password, please contact us.

Summary

This case is about a travel-based service learning course that attempts to carry out community-based planning. It presents a scenario where two community groups propose different approaches for addressing the solid waste collection problems their informal settlement has been facing for many years. Students must decide if they will present recommendations that supports one group’s proposal over the other, or if they will attempt to remain neutral to avoid tensions, while slowing the decision-making process. The case requires students to think about the socio-political implications of offering “technical assistance” and the benefits and drawbacks of pursuing community-led verses public-private waste collection in informal settlements.

Learning Objectives

  • Understand the tradeoffs between small-scale and large-scale approaches to solid waste collection.

  • Recognize that multiple community groups can exist in one place and that potential conflicts can arise in “community-based” problem solving.

  • Consider the implications of planners supporting an approach to a problem advocated by some, but not all groups in a community.

  • Think about the role of students and universities in planning studio courses in low-income and marginalized communities.

  • Appreciate the different challenges of carrying out long-term versus short-term timelines for project completion.

Case Materials

Instructor Version
Student Version
PowerPoint Presentation

Suggested Readings

  1. Botes, L. and D. van Rensburg. (2000). Community participation in development: Nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 35(1): Social Science Module. Download the full paper

  2. Aassad, R. (1996). Formalizing the informal? The transformation of Cairo’s refuse collection system. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2): 115-126. Read the abstract 

  3. Crabtree, R. D. (2013). The intended and unintended consequences of international service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(2), 43-66. Download the full paper

ACCESS THIS CASE

To download these case materials, including the instructor version, student version, and PowerPoint presentation, request access at the link below:

Better but not Best: Incremental Improvements and Bus Rapid Transit Planning

Better but not Best: Incremental Improvements and Bus Rapid Transit Planning

The Point of No Return: Informal Settlement Upgrading

The Point of No Return: Informal Settlement Upgrading